|
A. |
If the client doesn't
like the interventionist, half the battle is lost.
|
|
B. |
The client may respond
more positively toward one member of the team. Should this occur the
chance of a successful outcome is enhanced by having that
interventionist take the lead in conducting the intervention. Rapport
is critical for a successful outcome.
|
|
|
|
A. |
If the client has issues with men and the interventionist is male
the outcome of the intervention could be negatively affected.
|
|
B. |
Sometimes a client may be more responsive to a male rather than a
female or vice-versa ---- this isn't clarified until the intervention
has begun. The team interventionist can then decide who will lead and
who will take a more passive role.
|
|
|
|
A. |
The participants are limited to a single perspective of the
process and client. The single interventionist depends solely on his
own expertise and insight.
|
|
B. |
The intervention participants are better trained and prepared for
the intervention due to being able to be exposed to both a male and
female perspective. In addition by having more than one
interventionist available the advantage of multiple experience,
expertise, and perspective is achieved.
|
|
|
|
A. |
A. The solo interventionist must carry the entire process relying
only upon his insight alone as to what the next "best step"
is to be.
|
|
B. |
Two interventionists working as a "Team" are able to
share the labor in conducting the intervention and on those occasions
when the intervention becomes lengthy in time the "fatigue
factor" is greatly reduced enhancing the likely hood of a
successful outcome. In addition, when two interventionists work
together as a team they have the advantage of working as co-facilitators
in being able to bring to bare twice the level of expertise and
insight. Furthermore, the team interventionist approach allows
greater ability to coordinate and adjust the strategy utilized during
the intervention.
|
|
|
|
A. |
The clients objections can be challenging and draining for the
best of interventionists when working alone, especially if over a
prolonged period time.
|
|
B. |
Interventionists working as a team have found that their ability
to overcome the client's objections has been, in effect, doubled by
working together. The old adage of "two heads are better than
one" clearly applies in the intervention setting.
|
|
|
|
A. |
The solo interventionist risks becoming exhausted, and therefore
less effective, if the intervention process becomes longer in duration.
|
|
B |
Should the intervention become particularly long in duration the
team interventionists are able to have greater stamina and
effectiveness. They have worked on a single intervention for as long
as eight hours.
|
|
|